Purchase your $199 Restaurant Location Site Report
Restaurant 1 3 5 Mile Radius Demographics & Market Data Available
Select your business or a competitor below to unlock site selection insights.
- Population Demographics included 5 and 10 year forecasts.
- Household Incomes
- Weekly Per Capita Expenditures across relevant restaurant categories
- Competitive Business Density (aka, how many similar businesses in the location)
- Other important factors to your industry
Restaurant Competitive Intelligence for Michigan
View a list of the local restaurant competition and click on location name for more details regarding estimated visitor traffic, population demographics, popular visit times, and more. Includes a 1, 3, 5-mile site selection data analytics report for each restaurant location.
Restaurant Locations | Affiliation | Services | Report | Popularity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000 Degrees Neapolitan Pizzeria | Counter Service, Dinner, Lunch, Pizza | View |
|
Explore Restaurant Locations by County in Michigan
Unlock population and market insights by exploring the best Michigan's county-level restaurant site locations.
Ideal Restaurant Counties
List of the Best Restaurant Locations by County in Michigan
- Alcona County (20)
- Alger County (28)
- Allegan County (212)
- Alpena County (63)
- Antrim County (51)
- Arenac County (31)
- Baraga County (14)
- Barry County (70)
- Bay County (185)
- Benzie County (52)
- Berrien County (351)
- Branch County (70)
- Brevard County (1)
- Calhoun County (248)
- Cass County (59)
- Charlevoix County (75)
- Cheboygan County (72)
- Chippewa County (66)
- Clare County (54)
- Clinton County (86)
- Crawford County (31)
- Dallas County (1)
- Delta County (67)
- Dickinson County (62)
- Eaton County (195)
- Emmet County (108)
- Galveston County (1)
- Genesee County (696)
- Gladwin County (30)
- Gogebic County (34)
- Grand Traverse County (267)
- Gratiot County (56)
- Hillsdale County (74)
- Houghton County (80)
- Houston County (1)
- Huron County (77)
- Ingham County (580)
- Ionia County (77)
- Iosco County (67)
- Iron County (23)
- Isabella County (130)
- Jackson County (234)
- Kalamazoo County (513)
- Kalkaska County (27)
- Kent County (1320)
- Keweenaw County (7)
- Lake County (19)
- Lapeer County (125)
- Leelanau County (69)
- Lenawee County (170)
- Lexington County (1)
- Livingston County (307)
- Luce County (14)
- Luzerne County (1)
- Mackinac County (58)
- Macomb County (1717)
- Manistee County (43)
- Marquette County (119)
- Mason County (56)
- Mecosta County (73)
- Menominee County (47)
- Midland County (129)
- Missaukee County (27)
- Monroe County (244)
- Montcalm County (83)
- Montmorency County (23)
- Muskegon County (300)
- Newaygo County (60)
- Oakland County (2879)
- Oceana County (45)
- Ogemaw County (54)
- Ontonagon County (17)
- Orange County (1)
- Osceola County (33)
- Oscoda County (13)
- Otsego County (67)
- Ottawa County (454)
- Pickaway County (1)
- Presque Isle County (25)
- Roscommon County (49)
- Saginaw County (351)
- San Diego County (1)
- Sanilac County (69)
- Schoolcraft County (21)
- Shiawassee County (90)
- St. Clair County (258)
- St. Joseph County (104)
- Summit County (1)
- Tuscola County (59)
- Van Buren County (135)
- Washington County (1)
- Washtenaw County (763)
Restaurant Site Selection Considerations for Michigan
Since 2014, Marc Smookler, Kevin James, and the Plotr Team have been empowering business operators and owners with location data insights. They are the geo-intelligence experts.
The consequences of not utilizing 1-3-5 reports for site selection in Michigan can be significant for restaurants. These reports provide valuable insights and data-driven analysis that can greatly inform the decision-making process and mitigate potential risks.
Without the guidance of 1-3-5 reports, restaurateurs may lack crucial information about the market dynamics and competitive landscape in Michigan. This can lead to poor site selection decisions, such as choosing a location with high competition and limited customer base. As a result, the restaurant may struggle to attract sufficient foot traffic and face fierce competition from well-established establishments, leading to reduced visibility and lower customer engagement.
Furthermore, without the insights provided by 1-3-5 reports, restaurants may overlook critical factors such as demographic trends, customer preferences, and spending patterns. Ignoring these key indicators can result in a mismatch between the restaurant concept and the target market's expectations. In such cases, the restaurant may fail to resonate with the local community, leading to poor customer satisfaction, negative reviews, and ultimately, a decline in revenue and profitability.
Additionally, not utilizing 1-3-5 reports may hinder the understanding of infrastructure and accessibility factors. A lack of knowledge about transportation networks, parking availability, and foot traffic patterns can result in a location that is inconvenient for potential customers. Difficulty in accessing the restaurant can deter diners and limit the restaurant's growth potential.
In conclusion, the failure to utilize 1-3-5 reports for site selection in Michigan can have significant consequences for restaurants. From overlooking market dynamics to neglecting crucial demographic and accessibility factors, the absence of data-driven insights can lead to poor site selection decisions, increased competition, lower customer engagement, and ultimately, a higher risk of failure in the competitive restaurant industry of Michigan.
More Restaurant Performance Insights
- The Top 10 Site-Selection Considerations When Opening a New Restaurant
- Why Restaurant Owners Should Utilize 1-3-5 Mile Radius Reports When Choosing a New Location
- Unveiling the Radius Report: Key Insights for Restaurant Operators to Drive Success
- Navigating the Radius: Avoiding Common Pitfalls When Analyzing 1-3-5 Mile Reports for Restaurant Success
- Reasons Restaurants Fail: Why Location Matters
- The Impact of Site Selection: Lessons from Failed Restaurant Franchises